Legal Opinion
Ritholz v. March
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 26, 1939No. 7317PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGroner, C. J.
Appellants are citizens of the United States and residents of the State of Illinois, and, as co-partners under the trade names of Dr. Ritholz Optical Company and National Optical Stores Company, are engaged in offering for sale and selling optical goods in several states. In the latter part of 1937 the Federal Trade Commission issued a complaint, charging appellants with unfair methods of competition in commerce in violation of Sec. 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. Appellants appeared and answered, denying the charge. The cause was docketed as Commission No. 3143 and referred to an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Posadas v. National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Hassett v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Railroad Co. v. GrantSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Crane v. HahloSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- D. C. Federation of Civic Associations, Inc. v. Thomas F. Airis, as Director of the District of Columbia Department of Highways and TrafficCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Suárez Martínez v. TugwellSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1947
- Myers v. H. L. Rust Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1943
- American Maritime Ass'n v. BlumenthalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977
- Federal Trade Commission v. Jantzen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.