Legal Opinion

State v. Vandenberg

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 2002No. 21,715PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALARID, Judge.

{1} This appeal requires us to decide whether Defendant’s constitutional right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures was violated when Defendant and his companion were detained, and thereafter subjected to a weapons pat down, following a routine traffic stop. We hold that Defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights were violated because (1) the officers who conducted the traffic stop had completed the purposes of the traffic stop and lacked a constitutionally adequate basis for further detaining Defendant, and (2) the officers lacked a reasonable suspicion that…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Murray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. State v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. VandenbergNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. AffsprungNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. State v. PierceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. State v. LoweNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. State v. DuranNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API