Doe v. Greenville County School District
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Pleicones
I agree with the majority that we should reverse the trial court’s dismissal of the Does’ negligent supervision claim, but I would also reinstate the loss of consortium claim. Like the majority, I would uphold the trial court’s dismissal of the negligent infliction of emotional distress claim and affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the breach of fiduciary duty claim and the breach of an In loco parentis claim. I have explained my reasoning for each of these conclusions using the order established in the majority opinion.
A. Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress
I would affirm the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Taylor v. MedenicaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Wright Ex Rel. Green v. Colleton County School DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Houck v. State Farm Fire & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Berger v. Charleston Consolidated Railway, Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
- South Carolina Department of Social Services v. SeegarsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.