Legal Opinion
National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. Karasek
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 6, 1941No. 6 Div. 821PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The rendition of judgment against defendant is assigned as error. The case was tried by the court without a jury, and the recognized presumptions obtain to support the judgment rendered. Andrews v. Grey, 199 Ala. 152, 74 So. 62.
The suit was on a policy of life insurance with a double indemnity clause when death was caused by accidental means. Plaintiff-appellee is the beneficiary under said policy with double indemnity benefits issued by defendant-appellant insurance company to his wife, who died on September 16, 1939, “of arsenic poisoning,” due to taking a dose of rat…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Andrews v. GreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Hand Lumber Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Nichols v. New York Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Homewood Dairy Products Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Grimes v. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- WB Davis Hosiery Mill, Inc. v. Word Lumber Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
- Gay v. The Pacific Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Grand Lodge Knights of Pythias of North America v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.