Legal Opinion
State v. Moore
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided June 3, 1986No. 771PA85PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
The Court is evenly divided. Under these circumstances, following the uniform practice of this Court and the ancient rule of praesumitur pro negante, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed, not as precedent but as the decision in this case. Lynch v. Hazelwood, 312 N.C. 619, 324 S.E. 2d 224 (1985).
Affirmed.
Justice BILLINGS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lynch v. HazelwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Lynch v. HazelwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. RaynorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- State v. PendergrassCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993