Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 3, 1986No. 771PA85PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The Court is evenly divided. Under these circumstances, following the uniform practice of this Court and the ancient rule of praesumitur pro negante, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed, not as precedent but as the decision in this case. Lynch v. Hazelwood, 312 N.C. 619, 324 S.E. 2d 224 (1985).

Affirmed.

Justice BILLINGS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lynch v. HazelwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Lynch v. HazelwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. RaynorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. State v. PendergrassCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993