Legal Opinion

Daniels v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1984No. 15419PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

A jury convicted appellant Hosey Daniels of robbery. On appeal, he raised numerous assignments of error. By a motion filed after briefing was concluded, appellant seeks remand of this appeal to the district court for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of ineffective trial counsel. For the reasons set forth below, we deny the motion.

A claim of ineffective trial counsel is generally based on factual allegations which must be explored at an evidentiary hearing. Consequently, a claim of ineffective trial counsel is properly raised in proceedings for post-conviction relief. See Lewis v.…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Bolden v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Lewis v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1984

4Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pellegrini v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Evans v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. RhoadesIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. McKague v. WhitleyNevada Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Varwig v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API