Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Joseph C. Frady v. United States of America, Richard A. Gordon v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 8, 1965No. 18357, 18358Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWright, Circuit Judge

At the close of all the evidence, counsel representing the appellants moved for a judgment of acquittal as to first degree murder on the ground there was insufficient proof of premeditation and deliberation.1 I think the motion should have been granted and the case submitted to the jury on the lesser included offenses of second degree murder and manslaughter.

I

“Premeditation and deliberation” were introduced into the law of homicide as a result of eighteenth century opposition to the widespread use of capital punishment.2 At common law there were no degrees of murder, and all murders were…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Curley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  5. United States v. RumelySupreme Court of the United States · 1953

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API