Legal Opinion
Archbold v. Industrial Land Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided August 29, 1933No. Docket No. 2, Calendar No. 37,031PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.
The action is to recover real estate brokerage commission. Summary judgment was denied •plaintiff, but was entered for- defendants.
Plaintiff negotiated a trade of land between defendant Industrial Land Company and the American Blower Corporation. An instrument was drafted by representatives of the corporations, in form and words a binding contract. It provided:
‘ ‘ The Industrial Land Company agrees to pay H. E. Archbold the sum of $8,575 for his services if this deal is completed. ’ ’
The instrument was signed: “Approved: J. S. L.” “O. K. with me: C. Gr. B.” “O. K. with me: C. T. M.” It was so…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Claxton v. MargolisMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Johnson v. WolfeMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by6 opinions
- Innovation Ventures v. Liquid ManufacturingMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
- Frost v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2012
- State of Missouri, ex rel. David K. Wills and James E. Salmon, Relators v. Honorable Tom DePriest, Jr., Circuit Judge, Circuit Court of St. Louis County, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Burtone, Inc. v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Karen Marie Krake v. Auto Club Insurance AssociationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.