Paris v. Union Pacific Railroad
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HOLMES, District Judge.
Jimmy Paris brought this action against his employer Union Pacific Railroad Company, under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”), 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq., alleging that he developed carpal tunnel syndrome from his work at Union Pacific. Union Pacific has now filed a motion in limine seeking to exclude the testimony of Union Pacific employees Tommy Stuart and Clint Lacy on the ground that Paris’s lawyers have communicated with them unethically. Stuart is employed as a railroad engineer. Lacy is a brakeman. Union Pacific also moves to exclude the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Weeks v. Independent School District No. I-89Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Shane Weibrecht v. Southern Illinois Transfer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Matter of Arkansas Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Tucker v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
- Queensberry v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Watkins v. Arkansas Elder Outreach of Little Rock, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
- Mendez v. Hovensa, L.L.C.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2008
- Hayes v. Wisconsin & Southern Railroad LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2019