Legal Opinion

Fitzgibbon v. Calvert

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1870No. 2,109PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSprague, J.

This is a suit upon an undertaking executed by defendants as a substitute for property ordered to be levied upon by the Sheriff by virtue of a writ of attachment in his hands, in a certain suit previously commenced in the Fifteenth District Court, by this plaintiff, against one Caleb Hyatt.

Ho material allegation of plaintiff’s complaint is denied by defendants, and the substantive matter as pleaded in the answer, even if proved as alleged, is no defense. The execution of the undertaking by defendants, and the consideration therefor—the subsequent judgment against the defendant, in the case in…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Loveland v. GarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Estate of WootenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Horton v. RobertSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API