Legal Opinion
Majchrzak v. Chrysler Credit Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 2, 1981No. Civ. 79-30030PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES HARVEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action under Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (hereinafter “Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). Plaintiff claims that the defendant violated Section 7(a)(1) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 207(a)(1), which requires compensation for nonexempt employees “at a rate of not less than one and one-half times the regular rate” of pay for all hours worked in a work week which exceeds forty hours. Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), plaintiff seeks both legal and equitable relief.
Defendant answers by stating that plaintiff was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- George McClanahan and William Clinger v. William B. MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- Peter J. Brennan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. General Motors Acceptance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Sun Pub. Co. v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- Robertson v. Argus Hosiery Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wendy Elwell, Plaintiff-Appellee v. University Hospitals Home Care Services, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- William Dove v. George A. Coupe, James Dovean Jewell v. George A. Coupe, D/B/A Admiral Limousine ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Caryk v. CoupeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
- Stansbury v. FaulknerDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020