Legal Opinion
Gould v. Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided November 10, 1992No. 61813PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRANE, Judge.
Petitioner, Dr. Daniel B. Gould, a Missouri licensed physician, appeals from an order of the trial court dismissing with prejudice Counts I through III of his first amended petition in which he sought equitable relief, a writ of mandamus and a writ of prohibition. The respondents in Counts I, II and III were the Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts [the Missouri Board], Deaconess Health Services Corp. [Deaconess], and Kemper Coffelt, an attorney.1 We find that none of the three counts states a claim for which relief can be granted and affirm the judgment of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- STATE EX INF. RIEDERER v. CollinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- State Board of Registration Ex Rel. Healing Arts v. FinchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Miller v. Ford Motor Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Shea v. BossolaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Davis v. CarmichaelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Berkowski v. St. Louis County Board of Election CommissionersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Haley v. GrooseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- Chancellor Development Co. v. BrandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Midland Property Partners, LLC v. WatkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Community Title Co. v. U.S. Title Guaranty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.