Miller v. Ford Motor Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SATZ, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiff Richard Miller filed suit against defendants, Costello Ford, Inc. (Costello) and Ford Motor Company (Ford). The trial court dismissed plaintiff’s fourth amended petition with prejudice. Plaintiff appeals. We affirm.
Plaintiff attempts to define the liability of Costello and Ford in three Counts: Count I — breach of an “implied and express warranty that [a car purchased by plaintiff from Costello] was fit for the ordinary purpose for which an automobile is used”; Count II — fraudulent representations concerning the conditions of the car; and Count III — punitive…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Scheibel v. HillisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Commercial Bank of St. Louis County v. JamesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Bennett v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Groh v. SheltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Green v. GreenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kent v. Charlie Chicken, II, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Bosley v. Kearney R-1 School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1995
- Williams v. Mercantile Bank of St. Louis NAMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Arnold v. ErkmannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Hanrahan v. Nashua Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.