Coors Brewing Co. v. Miller Brewing Co.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM- OPINION AND ORDER
KANE, Senior District Judge.
Defendant Miller and Molson brewing companies, together with certain related importing and distribution entities, move to dismiss brewing rival Coors’ antitrust claims against them for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, lack of standing and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The three Molson defendants that are Canadian entities also dispute this court’s in personam jurisdiction over them and move to dismiss Coors’ complaint on that independent ground as well. For the reasons set forth below, I deny both…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Boyd v. AWB LTD.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Angus Chemical Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- Animal Science Products, Inc. v. China National Metals & Minerals Import & Export Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- In Re Commercial Explosives LitigationDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1996