Legal Opinion
In Re Gherman
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.
Decided May 22, 1989No. 19-12042PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEBTOR’S REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
THOMAS C. BRITTON, Chief Judge.
On May 19, the debtor, Gherman, in pro per, wrote me a letter, attaching a District Court form “Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis” and in his letter requested that I grant his request and provide him with an attorney skilled in bankruptcy law and provide him with a copy of all documents, transcriptions, depositions, and correspondence relating to his bankruptcy case.
The motion is denied.
The Sixth Amendment addresses a right to counsel but extends that right only to criminal and quasi-criminal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hannah v. LarcheSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- National City Bank v. Flowers (In Re Flowers)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1988
- Fisher v. CFC Capital Corp. (In Re DuPage Boiler Works, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
3Cited by4 opinions
- Block v. Citizens Bank (In Re Moss)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2000
- Clippard v. Russell (In Re Russell)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2008
- In Re LambUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · 1997
- John Anthony CrosbyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2025