Bowles v. Askew
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Sears-Collins, Justice.
Appellant John C. Bowles took but did not pass the July 1993 attorneys’ examination for admission to the practice of law in Georgia. See Rules Governing Admission to the Practice of Law (Rules), Part C, Section 1. Bowles then petitioned the superior court for a writ of mandamus directing the Georgia Office of Bar Admissions to allow Bowles’ representative to inspect certain examination papers. Specifically, Bowles sought to have his representative inspect the answers which were matched with his name as well as the answers of five other applicants who took the same…
2Cited by2 opinions
- In re BowmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- In re GoodmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003