Legal Opinion

Hillman v. Hillman

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1941No. 7716PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge Brewster

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

In this case the parties seek to partition the estate left by their deceased intestate parents. Judgment of the district court was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. See 135 S. W. (2d) 802, wherein appears a detailed statement of the facts, which will not be here repeated except as may be necessary to explain the points discussed.

Writ of error was granted by the Supreme Court because the case involves a construction of Article 2292, of the Revised Civil Statutes of Texas (1925), which (omitting portions not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Fort Worth v. GauseTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Boggs v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Gresham v. Harcourt, AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  4. Hillman v. HillmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gevinson v. Manhattan Construction Co. of OklahomaTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Trice Production Company v. Dutton Drilling CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  3. Dahl v. AkinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Ballard v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. Cameron v. CameronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API