Legal Opinion

People v. Russum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 1, 1973PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDel Vecchio, J.

The Trial Judge correctly denied defendant’s motion to suppress the marijuana, the basis for the conviction. In the nighttime two State Police officers stopped defendant’s automobile, driven by him, because its tail light was not lit. They performed a routine inspection of the exterior of the vehicle and found that two of the tires were unsafe. The Trial Judge found upon sufficient evidence that the police then had defendant open the trunk of his vehicle so that they could see whether he had spare tires that could be used to replace the unsafe ones and whether the tail light could be made…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cobb v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. People v. Abrucci-KohanMonroe Justice Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API