Legal Opinion

Black & Decker Corp. v. United States

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided October 22, 2004No. Civ. WDQ-02-2070PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REVISED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

QUARLES, District Judge.

Black & Decker Corporation (“B & D”) has sued the United States of America for a refund of over $57 million dollars in federal taxes, plus interest, which it contends were erroneously assessed and collected for tax years 1995 through 2000. Pending is B & D’s motion for summary judgment on the complaint and the counterclaim. No hearing is necessary. Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md.). For the reasons discussed below, B & D’s motion for summary judgment will be granted.

BACKGROUND

In 1998, B & D sold three of its businesses. As a result of these…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Moline Properties, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Frank Lyon Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The Black & Decker Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  2. Gerdau MacSteel, Inc. & Affiliated Subsidiaries v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2012
  3. Coltec Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API