Legal Opinion

Pye v. Diebold

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 20, 1939No. 31,896PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover attorney’s fees; the basis, one of quantum meruit. His motion for an instructed verdict “in an amount to be fixed by the jury” was granted; but the resulting award was in his estimation much too meager, so he moved for a new trial. That being denied, he appeals.

Defendants were the owners of six shares of stock in a Colorado corporation for which a consideration of $1,800 had been paid. Later that corporation experienced financial difficulties and became bankrupt. The parties originally creating it sought to recoup their…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lawler v. DunnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Morris v. WulkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tonn v. ReuterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. In Re Estate of FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. STATE, BY LORD v. ShirkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Becker County National Bank v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. Fearon v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API