Legal Opinion

Hillis v. Lake

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 15, 1995PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

The plaintiffs, partners in a real estate brokerage firm, brought this action in the Superior Court to recover a commission on a sale of real estate. The complaint asserted claims of breach of contract, quantum meruit, and a violation of G. L. c. 93A, § 11 (1994 ed.). The case was tried before a judge sitting without a jury. The judge concluded that the plaintiffs were entitled to a commission with interest and, on her finding of a violation of G. L. c. 93A, an award of attorney’s fees. The Appeals Court reversed the judgment, 38 Mass. App. Ct. 221 (1995), concluding that the plaintiffs were…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ellsworth Dobbs, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  2. Lewis v. EmersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  3. Tristram's Landing, Inc. v. WaitMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Bump v. RobbinsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  5. Capezzuto v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Finard & Co. v. Sitt Asset ManagementMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
  2. Sparks v. Fidelity National Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  3. BIPING HUANG & another v. RE/MAX LEADING EDGE & others.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
  4. In Re Snowcrest Development Group, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
  5. Discover Realty Corp. v. DavidMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API