Legal Opinion

Towne v. Cope

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 6, 1977No. 7630SC776PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Since it is not necessary, even inadvisable in most cases, for the trial court in ruling on a motion for summary judgment to find the facts specially and state separately its conclusions of law as in a trial before the judge without a jury, Wall v. Wall, 24 N.C. App. 725, 212 S.E. 2d 238 (1975), we do not rule specifically on plaintiff’s numerous assignments of error based on exceptions to the findings and conclusions made in this case. Rather, we go directly to the question of whether the alleged slanderous statements made by the defendant to the Sheriff were qualifiedly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ramsey v. . CheekSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Stewart v. Nation-Wide Check CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Ponder v. CobbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Wall v. WallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dobson v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Jordan v. State Ex Rel. Department of Motor Vehicles & Public SafetyNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Clark v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Shuping v. BarberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Fenelon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API