Legal Opinion
Rosnick v. Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 1, 1977PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Per curiam
This action was brought as a result of the adoption of an “Interim Development Regulation” by the zoning commission of the town of Southbury effective April 9, 1975. The amendment was made applicable to portions of, but not all of, the business districts in the town. By its terms, the amendment regulated those portions of the business districts to which it applied by prohibiting the granting of zoning permits for any additional use or any change of use of land or buildings, or alterations or construction of any buildings. The amendment was to expire on December 31, 1975, or upon earlier…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- DeFunis v. OdegaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Moore v. OgilvieSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Protect Hamden/North Haven from Excessive Traffic & Pollution, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Connecticut Foundry Co. v. International Ladies Garment Workers UnionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Waterbury Hospital v. Connecticut Health Care AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Tomasso Bros. v. October Twenty-Four, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Stafford Higgins Industries, Inc. v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.