Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Brophy v. Crawford

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1934No. 24313PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This cause came on to be heard upon the petition of relator, praying that a writ of mandamus issue compelling the respondent, as prosecuting attorney, to immediately make and prosecute an application to the Court of Appeals for leave to bring and prosecute an action in quo warranto, to try the right of relators’ title to offices of directors of a private corporation, to oust the incumbents therefrom, and to induct the relators into said offices; the answer of the prosecuting attorney, admitting that- a request to bring a proceeding in quo warranto, or file an application for leave therefor,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Cleveland ex rel. Neelon v. LocherOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State ex rel. Borsuk v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State Ex Rel. Cook v. Seneca County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State ex rel. New Riegel Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Ohio School Facilities Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API