Legal Opinion
In Matter of Application of US for an Order
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided January 26, 2006No. 06-5021M-01PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM RULING
HORNSBY, United States Magistrate Judge.
Introduction
Before the court is an ex parte application for an order authorizing the installation and use of a pen register and trap and trace device on a number assigned to a cell phone. In order to obtain this information, the Government must certify in its application to the court that the information sought is relevant and material to an ongoing investigation. 18 U.S.C. § 3122(b). The instant application meets that standard and is otherwise in good form. However, the instant application is unique in that it also seeks prospective…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. KaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. KnottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- In Re US for an Order Aut. Dis. of Prosp. CellDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2006
- In Re the United States of America for an Order Authorizing the Release of Prospective Cell Site InformationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- In Re Applic. of US for an Order for DisclosureDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
3Cited by29 opinions
- American Civil Liberties Union v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- State v. EarlsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- Shawn Alvin Tracey v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
- In re the United States for an Order Authorizing Disclosure of Location Information of a Specified Wireless TelephoneDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- In Re the United States for Orders Pursuant to Title 18District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.