Legal Opinion

Reynolds International Pen Co. v. Eversharp, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided July 8, 1946No. Civil Action No. 739PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LEAHY, District Judge.

Plaintiff1 seeks declaratory judgment that its product, a fountain pen, does not infringe defendants’ 2 patents and, further, alleges defendants are guilty of conspiracy to violate antitrust laws. Injunction3 and triple damages of $1,000,000 for alleged business loss are sought..The complaint charges defendants, acting both individually and in a joint conspiracy, attempted to obstruct and prevent a mass distribution, in both domestic and foreign markets, of a ball-pointed pen manufactured and sold by plaintiff. Specifically, the charge is, to effectuate their purpose…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Dioguardi v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  2. Continental Collieries, Inc. v. ShoberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. Saalfield Pub. Co. v. G. & C. Merriam Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  4. Tahir Erk v. Glenn L. Martin Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  5. Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Park-In Theatres, Inc. v. Paramount-Richards Theatres Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API