Reynolds International Pen Co. v. Eversharp, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, District Judge.
Plaintiff1 seeks declaratory judgment that its product, a fountain pen, does not infringe defendants’ 2 patents and, further, alleges defendants are guilty of conspiracy to violate antitrust laws. Injunction3 and triple damages of $1,000,000 for alleged business loss are sought..The complaint charges defendants, acting both individually and in a joint conspiracy, attempted to obstruct and prevent a mass distribution, in both domestic and foreign markets, of a ball-pointed pen manufactured and sold by plaintiff. Specifically, the charge is, to effectuate their purpose…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Dioguardi v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Continental Collieries, Inc. v. ShoberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Saalfield Pub. Co. v. G. & C. Merriam Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
- Tahir Erk v. Glenn L. Martin Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Park-In Theatres, Inc. v. Paramount-Richards Theatres Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1950