Legal Opinion

Kittitas County v. Allphin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 2018No. 93562-9Published

1Opinion of the Court

' fj ^ • This opinion was filed for record FlUE IN CLERKS OFFICE aintBC COUTT,SVOE OF WASHMeraN onmriyj. n f'^rAiAluMk-f. aj. GHi&JUSTKe SUSAN L. CARLSON supreme court clerk IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KITTITAS COUNTY, a municipal No. 93562-9 corporation and poiitical subdivision of the State of Washington, En Banc Respondent, V, Filed 1 7 2018 SKY ALLPHIN, ABC HOLDINGS, INC., CHEM-SAFE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., Petitioners, WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY, Defendant. WIGGINS, J.—We decide here two important aspects of the work product doctrine. First, were the e-mails…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API