Legal Opinion

D'Amato v. United States Parole Commission

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 14, 1988No. 1310, Docket 87-2104PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PIERCE, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, Warren W. Eginton, Judge, denying appellants’ petitions for writs of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S. C. § 2241 (1982). Appellants presented several common and other claims of procedural deficiencies that allegedly violated their due process rights and thus invalidated the United States Parole Commission’s revocations of their paroles. They contend that the district court erred in upholding some of the challenged procedures and in finding that no prejudice resulted…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. George Heath v. United States Parole Commission and Robert Henderson, Superintendent of Auburn Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  4. United States ex rel. Carson v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  5. Vincent Lynch v. United States Parole Commission and Michael Quinlan, Warden, RespondentsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Frank D'AmAto v. United States Parole Commission, Thomas Stabile v. United States Parole Commission, James R. Moore v. United States Parole Commission and Dennis M. LutherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API