Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mathis v. McDonald

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided August 19, 2016No. 2015-7094Published

1Dissent

REYNA, Circuit Judge, with whom NEWMAN and WALLACH, Circuit Judges, join,

dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc.

In declining to undertake an en banc review, the court leaves in place a judicially created evidentiary presumption that in application denies due process to veterans seeking disability benefits. The presumption, that the Veterans Administration ordinarily and routinely selects competent medical examiners as a matter of due course, was created void of any evidentiary basis. Its application has resulted in a process that is inconsistent with the Congressional imperative that the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Bradshaw v. RicheySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Angel S. Nieves-Rodriguez v. James B. PeakeUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2008
  5. James R. Cook, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API