Legal Opinion
Distasio v. Surrette Storage Battery Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 29, 1944PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.
This bill is brought to enjoin an alleged nuisance *134in the carrying on of the defendant’s battery manufacturing plant in the vicinity of the plaintiff’s residence in Salem, and for damages. The evidence is not reported, but the judge made findings of material facts. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 214, § 23. He took two views of the premises, one of them in the night time.
From findings which need not be recited in detail it appears that the defendant’s factory and the plaintiff’s house are located on or near the line of demarkation between an area devoted to industrial uses and an area devoted to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Birnbaum v. PamoukisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Stevens v. Rockport Granite Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Carilli v. HerseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Plumer v. Houghton & Dutton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Topor v. ToporMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Minot v. MinotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Carilli Construction Co. v. John Basile & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Lucier v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Sprague v. Rust Master Chemical Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Cooperstein v. BogasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.