Niles v. Edwards
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
Appeal from the judgment on the judgment roll.
Judgment on the findings was for defendant; the plaintiff, who takes this appeal, claims that the findings do not support the judgment, but, on the contrary, show that plaintiff was entitled to recover.
*12It appears from them that defendant was a stock-broker and a member of the Stock and Exchange Board. Plaintiff was the owner of one hundred shares of stock in the Ophir Mining Company. This certificate, like many others, as the practice was, had been issued to a trustee, who had indorsed it in blank, in which form it passed from hand to…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Meyer v. SeidelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- Ions v. HarbisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Niles v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Robinson v. RaquetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Clapp v. VatcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.