Legal Opinion

Kay v. MEADORS

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 17, 1950No. 16342PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stukes, Justice.

Appellant presents a single question for decision which sufficiently reflects the facts, as follows:

After an action has been instituted by a plaintiff against a defendant automobile for personal injuries alleged to have resulted from its negligent or willful operation, bond given, attachment dissolved and car released, under the statute, and a voluntary nonsuit taken in said cause, can plaintiff re-attach the said automobile in a subsequent action against the same automobile for the same injuries or for the same cause of action ?

Respondent makes another and preliminary issue…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Allen v. Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  2. National Exchange Bank v. StellingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890
  3. Skalowski v. Joe Fisher, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  4. Winder v. . PennimanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. Brigman v. One 1947 Ford Convertible Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Howle v. Twin States Express, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Gulledge v. YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  3. Allen v. SOUTHERN RY. CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  4. Moore v. Southern Coatings & Chemical Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API