Legal Opinion

Marcy v. Township of Oswego

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 18, 1876No. 729PublishedCited by 53 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Strong

At the trial in the Circuit Court, the plaintiff proved by competent evidence that the bonds, coupons of which were declared upon, were part of a series of bonds for $100,000 voted and issued by the township, and that they were so voted and issued in strict compliance with an act of the legislature of the State, approved Feb. 25, 1870, unless they were voted and issued in excess of the amount authorized by the act. It became, therefore, a question whether, in this suit, brought by a bona fide holder for value to recover the amount of some of the coupons, it could be shown, as a defence to a…

2Cited by53 opinions

  1. Commissioners of Marion County v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Dixon County v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Gunnison County Commissioners v. RollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Chaffee County v. PotterSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Sutliff v. Lake County CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API