Legal Opinion
Moak v. Mehlman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided December 13, 1945PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Per Curiam.
Under the facts presented in this case, a fair interpretation of the landlord’s use, would include that of the daughter. It was error, therefore, for the court to dismiss the petition at the end of the landlord’s case.
The final order should be unanimously reversed, upon the law, and new trial granted, with $30 costs to the landlord to abide the event.
MacCrate, Smith and Steinbrink, JJ., concur.
Order reversed, etc.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Braunstein v. SwartzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1947
- Caffaro v. RossNew York Supreme Court · 1948
- Kullman v. CamermaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1946
- Prete v. FinkelsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1948
- Manogue v. HeilbronerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.