Legal Opinion

Manogue v. Heilbroner

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 1949No. 735PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, the owner of a three-story house, sued defendant for possession of a two-room basement apartment. Her demand for possession was based on the claim that she required the apartment for her immediate and personal use as authorized by the District of Columbia Emergency Rent Control Act. Code 1940, Supp. VI, 45 — 1605(b) (2).

Plaintiff’s physician testified that she was suffering from “paralysis agitans, an ailment for which medical science has not discovered a cure.” He went on to say, “‘This .disease causes plaintiff to tremble and shake continually and to become…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Norwegian Old People's Home Society v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Mullins v. NordlowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Galusca v. DoddCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  4. Colter v. LukeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. Cicchino v. BiarskyUnited States District Court · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. RainesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
  2. Thomas v. WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API