Legal Opinion

Hinshaw v. Brannon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 25, 1933No. 21542PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

The defendant in error recovered a judgment against the plaintiffs in error for a personal injury which she received while in their employment. From that judgment the defendants appealed.

The plaintiffs in error herein contend that there was no actionable negligence on the part of the defendants; that the plaintiff was not acting within the scope of her employment at the time she sustained the injury complained of; that' incompetent evidence was admitted over the objection of the defendants, and that the trial court made prejudicial remarks during the progress of the trial.

We have carefully…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Local Building & Loan Ass'n v. Hudson-Houston Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Abraham v. GelwickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Watson v. DossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Stanfield v. LincolnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bolon v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. City of Mangum v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. City of Norman v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Panther Oil & Gas Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Barnsdall Oil Co. v. RicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API