Legal Opinion

Spoden v. Krause

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 3, 1946No. 17,505PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoyse, J.

Appellees brought this action against appellant Parrie Spoden and her husband, Fred G. Spoden, for specific performance of a contract to sell real estate. After the trial court overruled the motion for a new «trial Fred G. Spoden died and appellant Executrix was duly substituted here.

The facts as disclosed by the pleadings and special findings of fact are substantially as follows:

On or about the 3rd day of April, 1945, Fred G. Spoden caused to be inserted in the Kokomo Tribune an advertisement offering for sale certain described real estate, owned and occupied by the Spodens as tenants by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Manley v. ColemanOhio Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Walcis v. KozacikIndiana Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Ash v. DaggyIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Clark v. RichardsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Cline v. StrongIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ridenour v. FranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Bryan Manufacturing Co. v. HarrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. UFG, LLC v. Southwest Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API