Grasso v. Holbrook, Cabot & Daly Contracting Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, Francesco Grasso, from a judgment, of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 11th day of March, 1904, upon the dismissal of the complaint by direction of the court after a trial at the Kings County Trial Term.
1Opinion of the Court
Jenks, J.:
This action is brought under chapter 600 of the Laws of 1902, for the plaintiff so avers in his complaint, and the trial court in rendering its decision said, without demur on the part of the plaintiff: “ In this case plaintiff admits that he cannot maintain the action under the common law and elects to proceed under chapter 600 of the Laws of 1902.” In paragraph 4 of his amended answer the defendant alleged “ that no notice pursuant to Section 2 of Chapter 600 of the Laws of 1902, entitled ‘An act to extend and regulate the liability of employers to make compensation for personal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rosin v. Lidgerwood Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Veginan v. MorseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Gmaehle v. . RosenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Smith v. LyonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
- Byers v. BourretCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sonnesyn v. Federal Cartridge Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1944
- Hope v. Soranton & Lehigh Coal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Wroblinski v. Holbrook Cabot & Rollins Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1914