Legal Opinion

Vonderschmidt v. Sur-Gro & Tri-State Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 2001No. S-00-095PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

NATURE OF CASE

Sur-Gro and its workers’ compensation insurer, Tri-State Insurance Co. of Minnesota (Tri-State), appealed from an order awarding Kenneth Vonderschmidt permanent partial disability benefits and vocational rehabilitation services. The Nebraska Court of Appeals reversed the judgment of the Workers’ Compensation Court review panel and remanded the cause with directions to dismiss. See Vonderschmidt v. Sur-Gro, No. A-00-095, 2000 WL 33121860 (Neb. App. Dec. 19, 2000) (not designated for permanent publication). Vonderschmidt filed a petition for further review, which this court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sandel v. Packaging Co. of AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Miller v. E.M.C. Insurance CompaniesNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Jordan v. Morrill CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Blizzard v. Chrisman's Cash Register Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Dawes v. Wittrock Sandblasting & Painting, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Frauendorfer v. Lindsay Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Soto v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Ludwick v. Triwest Healthcare Alliance and Physicians Clinic, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Armstrong v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API