Legal Opinion
North American Printing Ink Co. v. Regensteiner Printing Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 20, 1992No. 91 C 6996, 90 B 4616PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GRADY, District Judge.
North American Printing Ink Company (“NAPIC”) appeals from a bankruptcy court’s order of September 17, 1991, denying its claim for an administrative expense. For the reasons stated below, the order is affirmed.
FACTS
NAPIC supplied ink to Regensteiner Printing Company (“Regensteiner”) by shipping large steel containers (“totes”) fully loaded with ink. Brief of Appellant, at 2. NAPIC would bill Regensteiner after NAPIC picked up the totes and determined how much ink had been consumed. Id. at 3. NAPIC delivered and Regensteiner received totes 122, 129, 121…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & BildiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re Mammoth Mart, Inc., Debtor. Stanley Cramer v. Mammoth Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- In the Matter of Jartran, Inc., Debtor. Appeal of Reuben H. Donnelley Corporation and Sandra C. Tinsley, IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Wright v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- In the Matter of Joseph Davidow Newman, Debtor. Robert M. Magill, Trustee-Appellant v. Joseph Davidow Newman, Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Steege v. at & T (In Re Superior Toy & Manufacturing Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- In re Nales PerezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014
- Kaufman v. S & C Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 1994
- In re: Angel T. Nales Perez and Zulma E. Guadarrama AyalaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014
- Keen, Inc. v. GeckerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003