Aero Corporation v. Associated Aerial Survey Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff has caused a ñ. fa. — an execution on a judgment — to be issued out of "this court, under which an aircraft owned by defendant subject to a chattel mortgage was sold by the Marshal.
Before the sale an intervenor claimed ■certain electronic equipment used for making aerial surveys, then on the aircraft, and received the equipment under ■a court order upon filing a bond. Plaintiff (1) challenges intervenor’s right to the equipment on several grounds, and ■(2) opposes ratification of the sale on the ground that the bid was inadequate. In support of the latter point,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- William J. Lemp Brewing Co. v. MantzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
- Dinsmore v. Maag-Wahmann Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
- Preissman v. CrockettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
- Mossler Acceptance Co. v. Norton Tire Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Forsyth Storage & Transfer, Inc. v. William E. Cramer Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bannister Bank & Trust v. City Management Co. (In re AmerEco Environmental Services, Inc.)District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1992
- State v. WoodwardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983