Legal Opinion

Aero Corporation v. Associated Aerial Survey Co.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided June 30, 1960No. Misc. 119PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff has caused a ñ. fa. — an execution on a judgment — to be issued out of "this court, under which an aircraft owned by defendant subject to a chattel mortgage was sold by the Marshal.

Before the sale an intervenor claimed ■certain electronic equipment used for making aerial surveys, then on the aircraft, and received the equipment under ■a court order upon filing a bond. Plaintiff (1) challenges intervenor’s right to the equipment on several grounds, and ■(2) opposes ratification of the sale on the ground that the bid was inadequate. In support of the latter point,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. William J. Lemp Brewing Co. v. MantzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  2. Dinsmore v. Maag-Wahmann Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  3. Preissman v. CrockettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  4. Mossler Acceptance Co. v. Norton Tire Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1954
  5. Forsyth Storage & Transfer, Inc. v. William E. Cramer Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bannister Bank & Trust v. City Management Co. (In re AmerEco Environmental Services, Inc.)District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1992
  2. State v. WoodwardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API