Legal Opinion

City of Aurora, Colo. v. Classic Syndicate, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 26, 1996No. 96 C 5741PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge:

Before the court are the parties’ cross motions to direct arbitration. For the follow ing reasons, the court grants the motion of the Movant and denies the cross motion of the Respondents.

I. BACKGROUND

Both parties move the court to direct arbitration of an insurance coverage issue pursuant to the terms of an insurance policy. They disagree about which arbitrators should preside over the arbitration.

The City of Aurora, Colorado, (“Aurora”) obtained excess liability insurance through the Illinois Insurance Exchange (“IIE”) in a series of policies dating…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wilkin Insulation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Universal Reinsurance Corporation v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. Schwinn Cycling & Fitness, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. Pamela Equities Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  2. In Re Arlington Hospitality, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  3. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's v. Argonaut Ins. CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API