Legal Opinion
Jones v. Commagere
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 12, 1939No. 17078PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JANVIER, Judge.
Misses Gladys and Mina Irma Jones attempted by garnishment process to collect a judgment for $1,451.12 in their favor and against Louis E. Commagere, Jr. The garnishee, Commagere Pharmacy, Inc., contended that it was not indebted to Comma-gere in any sum whatever; that his salary was $60 per month, and that, because of the provisions of Act No. 183 of 1932, it was entirely exempt from seizure. The garnishee further maintained that, on the contrary, Commagere was indebted to it in the sum of $945.21 for amounts which he had withdrawn in addition to his salary. When the matter…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reeves v. Globe Indemnity Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Wheeler v. RodriguezLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- West Orleans Beach Corporation v. MartinezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- Beneficial Loan Soc. of New Orleans v. StraussLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- Cazeaux v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Martino v. FairburnLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
- La Rocca v. DupepeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- La Barre v. MallardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957