Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Sharp

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1995PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

There is support in the record for the findings of the courts below that plaintiff board of managers acted in bad faith and without basis in law when it refused defendants’ request for permission to alter the building’s structure so as to connect defendants’ existing basement garage to an affiliated basement garage in an adjacent building (see, Humphrey v State of New York, 60 NY2d 742, 743-744). We also agree with the Appellate Division’s conclusion that defendants are not entitled to recover…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Hooper Associates Ltd. v. AGS Computers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Polin v. KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Chapel v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Humphrey v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brasseur v. SperanzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Wright v. SelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Congel v. MalfitanoCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2018
  4. Versatile Housewares & Gardening Systems, Inc. v. Thill Logistics, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  5. City of New York v. ZuckermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API