Legal Opinion

Haimowitz v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 11, 2015No. 09 Civ. 10068 (JFK)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

John F. Keenan, United States District Judge:

Before the Court is Defendant Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Defendant seeks summary judgment on the ground that Plaintiff Beryl Haimowitz’s tort and warranty claims are untimely under New York law.1 For the reasons that follow, the motion is granted and summary judgment is entered in Defendant’s favor.

I. Background

The following facts are taken from the record following discovery. This case concerns allegations that Plaintiffs use of the drug Aredia…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. William M. Gummo v. Village of Depew, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  5. Matter of Ny County Des Litig.New York Court of Appeals · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kristi Vuksanovich and Mark Vuksanovich v. Airbus Americas, Inc. and Airbus S.A.S.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API