Legal Opinion
Wiener v. Unumprovident Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 28, 2002No. 00 CIV. 9315(NRB)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BUCHWALD, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Ruth Wiener (“Wiener”), commenced this lawsuit in New York Supreme Court in November of 2000, alleging claims for breach of contract, violation of General Business Law (“GBL”) § 349, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and bad faith. Defendants Unumprovident Corporation (“Unum”), Paul Revere Life Insurance Company (“Paul Revere”), and New England Life Insurance Company (“New England”) removed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441 on diversity grounds. Presently before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Howell v. New York Post Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- New York University v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Newton v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Poller v. BioScrip, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Medcalf v. WalshDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Abbatiello v. Monsanto Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Endemann v. Liberty Ins. Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 2019
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.