Legal Opinion
Cain v. Redbox Automated Retail, LLC
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 30, 2015No. 12-CV-15014PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING THE PARTIES’ CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT .
Gerald E. Rosen, Chief Judge, United States District Court
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Michelle Cain and Radha Sam-pat brought a putative class action against Defendant Redbox, a video rental company, based on Defendant’s alleged unlawful disclosure to third parties of certain personal information obtained during Defendant’s rental process. Plaintiffs assert three causes of action: (i) a violation of Michigan’s Video Rental Privacy Act (“VRPA”), M.C.L. § 445.1711 et seq.; (2) breach of contract; and (3) unjust…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anthony A. Calderone, Clark Hornbaker, Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Alvery Pack v. Damon Corporation, General R v. CenterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Board of Managers of Chestnut Hills Condominium Ass'n v. Pasquinelli, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- McWhorter v. Realty World-Star, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wilson v. Redbox Automated Retail, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020