Legal Opinion

McInturf v. Horton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1975No. 43580PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

The question herein is whether counsel must be appointed for an indigent defendant in a misdemeanor case wherein conviction may result in loss of liberty. We hold such appointment of counsel is required.

Appellant was charged in the Benton County District Court, Kennewick Municipal Division, with violations of certain Kennewick city ordinances — negligent driving and leaving the scene of an accident. Those violations are punishable under the Kennewick City Code by imprisonment up to 6 months in jail and/or a fine of up to $500.

Appellant informed the district court judge that the sole means of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Hendrix v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Tetro v. TetroWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. WadsworthWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. WadsworthWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Roe v. Quality Transportation ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  5. State v. SkillmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API