Legal Opinion

Viers v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 1988No. WD 39851PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANFORD, Presiding Judge.

This is a direct appeal from the denial of post-conviction relief sought pursuant to Rule 27.26. The judgment is affirmed.

Movant presents a sole point which, in summary, charges that the hearing court erred in denying him post-conviction relief because the court concluded that he was not entitled to jail time credit on a driving while intoxicated conviction (second offense) due to being on bond although he was in actual custody.

In this post-conviction proceeding, mov-ant seeks credit for jail time or more correctly, he stated that he seeks “double credit” for jail…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Goings v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  2. Vernor v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Davis v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Scott v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Davidson v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API