Viers v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MANFORD, Presiding Judge.
This is a direct appeal from the denial of post-conviction relief sought pursuant to Rule 27.26. The judgment is affirmed.
Movant presents a sole point which, in summary, charges that the hearing court erred in denying him post-conviction relief because the court concluded that he was not entitled to jail time credit on a driving while intoxicated conviction (second offense) due to being on bond although he was in actual custody.
In this post-conviction proceeding, mov-ant seeks credit for jail time or more correctly, he stated that he seeks “double credit” for jail…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Goings v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- Vernor v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Davis v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Scott v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Davidson v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.