Legal Opinion

Cannon Ball Cab & Bus Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 19, 1936Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Richardson

— Affirming.

The correctness of tbe amount of the judgment rendered is admitted. The sole question to be determined is whether the evidence adduced sustains the grounds of attachment contained in the petition. The grounds are:

“The defendants have no property in this state subject to execution or not enough thereof to satisfy the plaintiff’s demand and the collection of the demand will be endangered by delay in obtaining a judgment of a return of no property found.’

See subdivision 2, section 194, Civil Code of Practice.

The Maryland Casualty Company, a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Francis v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1886
  2. Burdett v. Phillips & Bro.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880
  3. Herman Goepper & Co. v. Phoenix Brewing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  4. Lexington Brewing Co. v. Goode & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API